> Compare
YoHe vs. Greenhouse.
Talent-acquisition teams running many concurrent reqs who need deep, configurable reporting and can absorb enterprise pricing and setup time.
Feature by feature.
Grounded in published pricing and commonly reported review themes — not a specific customer's quote.
Feature
YoHe
Greenhouse
Pricing
Published: $49–$249/month
Custom quote; third-party estimates put a 10-person team at $6,000+/year
Contract length
Monthly, no annual requirement
Typically annual
Roles included
Every role on every plan
Some features reported as restricted to admin-only roles
Reporting & export
Included on Team and Growth
Reporting flexibility is the most consistently cited weakness in reviews
Setup time
Minutes, guided onboarding
Days to weeks of configuration
AI screening
None yet — not marketed as something it does
Marketed, though reviewers report it moves cautiously compared to newer entrants
What comes up in Greenhouse reviews.
Themes commonly reported on G2 and Capterra, paraphrased rather than attributed to a specific named person.
- // 001"Too many clicks to do anything" and an interface reviewers describe as dated, in reviews from users who evaluated switching away.
- // 002Reporting and analytics repeatedly cited as the platform's biggest weakness — the underlying data model is described as making it hard to get flexible reports out.
- // 003Some features reported as locked behind admin-only permissions, limiting what recruiters can do without an administrator.
Verdict
// 001
Greenhouse is built to be grown into, with the reporting depth and configurability that comes with enterprise pricing and setup time. YoHe is built to be used on day one, by a team that doesn't have a recruiting department yet.
// 002
What YoHe doesn’t do yet: AI-assisted screening or scoring, deep third-party integrations, and enterprise-scale reporting for teams running dozens of simultaneous reqs.