> Compare

YoHe vs. Workable.

Mid-market companies (roughly 51–1,000 employees) hiring consistently, who value wide job-board syndication and a large candidate database.

[n.01/03]> Side by side

Feature by feature.

Grounded in published pricing and commonly reported review themes — not a specific customer's quote.

Feature

YoHe

Workable

Pricing

$49/month entry tier, published

$299/month Standard tier, after removing its cheaper starter plan

AI billing

No AI features, so no AI billing

AI features reported to bill per credit on top of the plan price

Calendar integration

Not built yet

Google Calendar sync for multiple attendees reported as unreliable

Contract length

Monthly, no annual requirement

Monthly available, but pricing targets larger teams

[n.02/03]> What reviewers say

What comes up in Workable reviews.

Themes commonly reported on G2 and Capterra, paraphrased rather than attributed to a specific named person.

  • // 001Removing the cheaper starter tier reportedly doubled the price of entry, making it "a tougher sell" for small teams that don't hire constantly.
  • // 002AI features billed per credit on top of the base plan — an added cost worth checking before signing up.
  • // 003Reporting and customization described as limited for advanced or high-volume use cases.
[n.03/03]> The short version

Verdict

// 001

Workable's real strength is job-board reach at mid-market hiring volume. For a small team hiring occasionally, that reach is scale you're paying for and not using.

// 002

What YoHe doesn’t do yet: AI-assisted screening or scoring, deep third-party integrations, and enterprise-scale reporting for teams running dozens of simultaneous reqs.

See it for yourself.

A 14-day free trial, no card required.

NextYoHe vs. JazzHR